Quick description
Suppose that you want to generate, uniformly at random, some combinatorial structure or substructure. If the structure is simple enough, then there may be an easy way of converting random bits into the structure you want, with the correct distribution. For example, to choose a random graph one can just pick each edge independently at random with probability 1/2. However, a trivial direct approach like this is often not possible: how, for example, would you choose a (labelled) tree uniformly at random? A commonly used technique in more difficult situations is to take a random walk through the "space" of all objects of interest and to prove that the walk is rapidly mixing, which means that after not too long the distribution of where the walk has reached is approximately uniform.
This article describes a few examples of the technique. Crucial to any application of the method is the proof that the Markov chain one constructs really is rapidly mixing. There are many ways of showing this, which are discussed in articles linked to from a rapid mixing front page.
Prerequisites
Basics of probability theory, definitions of combinatorial concepts such as graphs, trees, the Boolean cube, etc.
Comments
Access to the "Revisions" page
Tue, 07/04/2009 - 17:29 — Sune Kristian Jakbsen (not verified)Why don't I have access to the "Revisions" page for this article?
It's because there have been
Tue, 07/04/2009 - 18:02 — olofIt's because there have been no revisions to the article. Perhaps we should display the tab regardless, to avoid confusion.
So it's not possible to find
Tue, 07/04/2009 - 19:19 — Sune Kristian Jakobsen (not verified)So it's not possible to find out who wrote a new article, without editing it first? In this case I think I have a good guess ;) but it might be harder later in the project, when anyone can make a new article.
That's a good point
Tue, 07/04/2009 - 20:12 — olofThat's a good point – one should be able to find out who wrote an article. I'll put this on the to-do list.
Post new comment
(Note: commenting is not possible on this snapshot.)