### Quick description

This is not a *trick* so much as a *heuristic* that allows one to not get too distracted with the unimportant components of an oscillatory integral (such as amplitude), and instead focus on the important components (namely, the geometry of the oscillation).

When controlling an oscillatory integral such as , the exact choice of amplitude function is rarely significant, so long as it is uniformly smooth with respect to all parameters of interest; one can often replace this amplitude function with another amplitude function so long as and have similar behaviour at the stationary points of (e.g. ).

A corollary of this is that any smooth perturbation of the phase by a bounded correction , thus replacing with should lead to an extremely similar integral. Thus, as a first approximation, any component of the phase which is both smooth and bounded can (heuristically, at least) be dropped for the purposes of trying to predict what the behavior of this integral should be.

### Prerequisites

Harmonic analysis

### Example 1

Suppose one wishes to estimate the integral for some test function and some large parameter . One can replace the cutoff function here by the more explicit function (which agrees with at the stationary point ), plus an error which vanishes at the stationary point. Computing the first term explicitly and bounding the second term via integration by parts, one obtains an asymptotic for this integral, namely ; see "linearize the phase" for further discussion.

### General discussion

Other examples of this general heuristic appear in "How to use the method of stationary phase to control oscillatory integrals".

See also "Getting rid of nasty cutoffs".

4 years 17 weeksago4 years 26 weeksago4 years 27 weeksago5 years 4 weeksago5 years 25 weeksago